[image ALT: Much of my site will be useless to you if you've got the images turned off!]
mail: Bill Thayer 
[image ALT: Cliccare qui per una pagina di aiuto in Italiano.]

[Link to a series of help pages]
[Link to the next level up]
[Link to my homepage]

[image ALT: link to previous section]
Appendix 1

This webpage reproduces a portion of
Royal Memoirs

on the
French Revolution

as translated by
John Wilson Croker
and published by
John Murray, Albemarle Street, London,

the text of which is in the public domain.

This text has been carefully proofread
and I believe it to be free of errors.
If you find a mistake though, please let me know!

[image ALT: a blank space]


 p288  II.

Of John Baptiste Harmand, one of the Commissioners of the Convention, appointed to inquire into the State of the Son of Louis XVI.


Few men, even in the Revolution, have suffered greater vicissitudes of fortune than J. B. Harmand, the author of the following paper. He was of a respectable family, and an advocate at bar before the Revolution. In 1792, he was elected to the Convention, where he voted for the exile of the King, which was equivalent, under the circumstances, to a vote of acquittal. Though he sat on the Mountain, he was really a modéré, not to say a royalist. After the fall of Robespierre, he became a member of the Committee of Public Safety, in which capacity he made an official visit to Louis XVII, which is the subject of the following narrative.

Harmand became a member of the Council of Ancients,  p289 and secretary of that body; he was afterwards elected to the Council of Five Hundred, and when the accession of Buonaparte began to produce a regular government, M. Harmand was appointed Prefect of a Department, and created successively a member of the Legion of Honour, and a Baron of the Empire. He, however, does not seem to have been a more cordial partisan of the Usurpation than he was of the Revolution; for he seems to have been deprived of his Prefecture, and reduced to an obscure and severe, but not dishonourable, poverty. In 1814, he published a pamphlet on the treatment of the Royal Family in the Temple, of which the following Report is an extract; but the sale of this work was too feeble a resource, and towards the end of 1815, this man — who had sat in all the legislatures of regenerated France — whose character and talents were always respectable — who held for a moment the fate of the Royal Family in his hands — who was governor of one of the most important departments of his country, and finally decorated with stars and titles of nobility — this man was found in December, 1815, starving of cold and hunger in the streets of Paris, and lived only to be conveyed to the public hospital.

The Report itself is extremely interesting, particularly on account of the firmness and sensibility evinced in the steady silence of the unfortunate child.

We arrived at the door, the bolts of which confined the innocent, the only son  p290 of our King — our King himself. — The key turned with a grating noise in the lock, and on the door being opened, we discovered a small ante-room, perfectly clean, with no other article of furniture in it but an earthenware stove, communicating, by an opening in the wall, with the adjoining room, and which stove could be lighted only in the ante-room. The commissaries observed to us that this precaution had been taken, in order not to leave a fire in the power of a child.

The room so adjoining was the Prince's chamber, containing his bed; the door was fastened on the outside, and we had again to wait for its being opened. These sounds of locks and bolts inspired a gloom, the more painful from being increased, rather than dispelled, by reflection.

The Prince was sitting near a small square table, on which were scattered a number of playing cards, some turned up into the shapes of trunks and boxes, and others raised into  p291 houses. He was occupied with these cards when we entered, and did not leave off his play. He had on a sailor's dress, new, and made of slate-coloured cloth; his head was uncovered; and the room was clean and well lighted. The bed was a small wooden one, without curtains, and the bedding linen seemed to us to be good and of a fine quality. The bed was behind the door, on the left hand on going in; and farther, on the same side, was another bedstead, without bedding, placed at the foot of the first. Between them was a door, which was shut, leading into another apartment which we did not see. The commissaries told us that the second bed had been that of the shoemaker Simon.

After having become acquainted with these preliminary details, I approached the Prince; but our motions did not appear to make any impression upon him. I told him that the government — informed too late of the bad state of his health, and of his refusal to take  p292 exercise, or to answer the questions put to him upon that subject, as well as his rejecting the proposals made to him to take some remedies, and to receive the visit of a physician — had sent us to him to ascertain these facts, and, in its name, to renew all those proposals; that we hoped they would be agreeable to him, but that we should take upon ourselves to offer him advice, and even to add reproaches, if he should persist in remaining silent, and in not taking exercise; that we were authorised to offer him such objects of diversion or recreation as he might desire; and that I requested he would tell me whether that pleased him.

Whilst I was thus addressing him, he looked at me steadfastly, without any change of position, and he listened to me apparently with the greatest attention; but not one word in reply.

I then began afresh my proposals, as conceiving that he had not understood me;  p293 and I detailed them pretty nearly in these words:

"I have perhaps explained myself badly, or perhaps you have not understood me, sir: I have the honour to ask whether you wish for a horse, a dog, birds, toys of any kind what soever; or one or more companions of your own age, whom we will present to you previously to their being permanently attached to you; will you, at the present moment, go down into the garden, or ascend the turrets? Do you wish for sweetmeats, cakes, &c.?"

I exhausted in vain the list of all the things that are usually wished for by children of his age; I did not receive a word of answer, not even a word or a motion, although his face was turned towards me, and he looked at me with an amazing fixedness, denoting the most utter indifference.

I then took upon me to assume a more decided tone, and I ventured to say to him, "Sir, so much obstinacy at your age is a  p294 fault that nothing can excuse: it is the more surprising, since our visit, as you must perceive, has for its object the affording some relief to your situation, some attentions and succours to your health; how can we attain this object, if you persist in refusing to answer, and to say what is agreeable to you? Is there any other way of making the proposal? have the goodness to state it, and we shall adopt it."

Still the same fixed look and the same attention, but not a word. I resumed:

"If your refusal to speak, sir, involved none but yourself, we would wait, not without pain, but with more patience, until you might be pleased to speak, as we must conclude that your situation is less displeasing to you than we imagined, since you will not change it: but you do not belong to yourself; all those about you are responsible for your person and your condition: do you wish that we ourselves should be blamed? For what answer can we give  p295 to the government, of which we are only the delegates? Have the goodness to answer me, I entreat you, or we must finish by commanding you."

Not a word, and always the same fixedness. I was in despair, as well as my colleagues: that look had especially so strong a feature of resignation and indifference, that it seemed to say, what does it matter to me? despatch your victim.

I could bear no more; my heart was full, and I was near giving way to tears of the bitterest grief; but some steps which I took about the room recovered me, and I resolved to try the effect of a tone of command. I tried it accordingly, placing myself close on the Prince's right hand, and saying to him, "Give me your hand." He gave it me; and, extending mine up to his arm-pit, I felt a swelling at the wrist, and one at the elbow. It seems that these swellings were not painful, for the Prince gave no sign of their being so.

 p296  "The other hand:" he gave it me likewise: but there was nothing.

"Allow me also to touch your legs and knees." He rose; and I found the same swellings under both knees.

In this position, the young Prince had the appearance of rickets, and a bad formation: his legs and thighs were long and thin, his chest raised, his shoulders high and narrow; his head was in every respect finely formed and beautiful; his complexion clear, but without colour; his hair long and handsome, well kept, and of a light chesnut colour.

"Now have the goodness to walk." He did so immediately, going towards the door, and returning at once to his seat.

"Do you think, sir, that that is exercise? And do you not perceive, on the contrary, that this apathy is alone the cause of your ill-health, and of the disorders with which you are threatened? Pray believe in our  p297 experience and regard for you: you cannot hope to recover your health but by attending to our proposals and advice. We will send you a physician, and we trust that you will consent to answer him; at least make us a sign that it will not be disagreeable to you."

Not a sign, not a word!

"Be so good, sir, as to walk again, and for a little longer time."

Silence and refusal. He remained on his seat, his elbows resting on the table: his features did not change for an instant; not the least motion apparent, not the least mark of surprise in the eyes; just as if we had not been present, and as if I had not spoken. I must observe that my colleagues1 said nothing.

We looked at each other in amazement;  p298 and we were advancing towards each other to exchange our reflections, when the Prince's dinner was brought.

A new scene of grief — it should have been seen and felt, to be believed.

A porringer of red earthen-ware contained a black soup, on the top of which floated a few lentils; and on a plate of the same material lay a small bit of boiled meat, also black and shrivelled, the bad quality of which was sufficiently apparent. There was a second plate of lentils; and a third, in which were six chesnuts, rather burnt than roasted; a pewter fork, but no knife. The commissaries told us that this was by order of the council of the commune: and there was no wine.

Such was the dinner of Louis XVII, of the successor to so many kings! and such was the treatment suffered by innocence!

Whilst the illustrious prisoner was eating this shameful meal, my colleagues and myself expressed by our looks to the commissioner  p299 of the municipality our astonishment and indignation: and in order to spare them, in the Prince's presence, the reproaches they deserved, I made them a sign to come into the ante-room. There we explained our sentiments; but they repeated that it was the order of the municipality, and that it was worse before their time. We ordered that this execrable system should be changed for the future, and that they should begin that moment to improve his dinner, and particularly to give him some fruit. I desired that grapes, which were then scarce, should be procured for him.

Having given these orders, we went back into the room, and found that he had eaten every thing. I asked him whether he was satisfied with his dinner?

No answer.

Whether he wished for some fruit?

No answer.

Whether he liked grapes?

 p300  No answer.

Shortly after the grapes were brought; they were placed on the table, and he eat them without speaking.

Do you wish for more?

No answer.

We could then no longer doubt that every effort on our part to induce him to speak would be useless. I told him the conclusion we had come to, and I said to him that it was the more painful to us, as we could attribute his silence, towards us, only to our having had the misfortune to displease him. I added, that we should, in consequence, propose to the government to send other commissioners who might be more agreeable to him.

The same look, but no reply.

Do you wish, sir, that we should withdraw?

No answer.

After these words we retired. I have stated that the motive to which the commissaries attributed the obstinate silence of  p301 the Prince was his having been forced by Simon to give evidence against his mother and his aunt. I inquired of them, in the ante-room, whether that silence really began on the day upon which that atrocious violence had compelled him to sign the odious and absurd deposition against the Queen. They repeated their assertions on that point, and protested that the Prince had not spoken since the evening of that day!

My colleagues and I agreed, that, for the honour of the nation, which was ignorant of these unhappy circumstances — for that of the Convention, which, indeed, knew them not, but which ought to have known them — and for that even of the criminal Municipality of Paris, which knew all, and which caused all these evils, we should confine ourselves to the ordering some steps of temporary alleviation (which were immediately carried into effect); and that we should not make a report  p302 in public, but in a secret committee;2 and it was so done.

J. W. Croker's Notes:

1 Reverchon and Mathieu: they had both been Jacobins, but came round, I believe, to less violent opinions.

2 This accounts for the extraordinary circumstances stated in this report being only to be found in M. Harmand's publication. — The poor Prince died in six months after this visit, and his persecutors hoped that the story of his sufferings would be buried with him.

[image ALT: Valid HTML 4.01.]

Page updated: 3 May 07