Return to C. cedonulli

Conus ammiralis Linnaeus 1758

Until Dunn made the distinction, C. cedonulli had been confused with Conus ammiralis, especially after Linnaeus added C. ammiralis cedonulli as an additional form. (The cone was so named because the golden stripes were reminiscent of those on an admiral's sleeve. Like tulips, it may have been, too, that the name was given to make the shell more desirable, just as a beautiful flamed tulip had been called Admirael der Admiraels de Gouda.)

This C. ammiralis is from the same plate in Seba's Thesaurus as the Cedo nulli (Volume III, Pl. XLVIII, fig. 8).


These two examples of C. ammiralis are among the tres rares shells of d'Argenville's Conchyliologie (1757). Linnaeus, too, singles out the species and its varieties as rare in Systema Naturae (10th ed., 1758, p.713).

Unlike the black and white example above, this page from d'Argenville's Conchyliologie has been colored by hand, although with mixed results. Of the figures illustrating C. ammiralis (N, O, P), only the latter approximates the actual shell. C. cedonulli is represented by the letter H, although from the fanciful coloring one would be hard put to recognize it. The Nautile Vitré (Carinaria cristata) takes pride of place as Figure B, the translucent shell given more color by art than nature. Indeed, because the color scheme of a shell is so important to its identification, this imaginative enhancement of the original print (especially when the colorist likely has not even seen the specimen) makes that task only more difficult.

A bibliographic note: In 1758, in the tenth edition of the Systema Naturae, Carl Linnaeus sought to enumerate and describe every plant and animal known to him, each to be uniquely identified by two latinized words (a binomen), the first indicating the genus to which the organism belonged, the second, the species. But as revolutionary as this system of binomial nomenclature was in classifying species, it had not been practical for Linnaeus to illustrate his work. Instead, shell collectors in the eighteenth-century had to depend on others, such as Seba or Regenfuss, whose work also appeared that year, or d'Argenville and Knorr, who had published the year before.

In 1757, just as Adanson was proposing a classification of mollusks based on their anatomical characteristics (anticipating Linnaeus by a year) and illustrated books were making shells easier to identify and collect, the craze for collecting was beginning to pass. The collection auctioned that year by the French ambassador to The Hague would, in retrospect, be regarded as a high point and very few sales during the second half of the eighteenth century would be as successful. Collected shells were becoming monotonously similar, with fewer new varieties being found. All this would change with the voyages of James Cook to the unexplored South Seas between 1768-1780. Holland no longer would be the center of shell collecting, as those from Dutch colonies gave way to new varieties from the Pacific.

(There was one other event in 1757: Having surrendered the day before to the French general at Fort William Henry in northeastern New York State, British troops were ambushed by France's Native American allies. It was this incident that inspired James Fenimore Cooper to write The Last of the Mohicans.

References: "On the Identity of Conus cedonulli Linnaeus 1767" (1971) by V. Rodger Dunn, The Veliger, 13(3), 290-291; Shell Collecting: An Illustrated History (1966) by S. Peter Dance; Linnaeus: Systema naturae (1758), 10th ed. (p.713, no.257); L'histoire naturelle, éclaircie dans une de ses parties principales, la conchyliologie, que traite des coquillages de mer, de riviere et de terre (1757) by A. J. Dézallier d'Argenville (pp.381-394);  Albertus Seba: Cabinet of Natural Curiosities (2001) by Irmgard Müsch, Jes Rust, and Rainer Willmann.

 Return to Top of Page