[image ALT: Much of my site will be useless to you if you've got the images turned off!]
mail: Bill Thayer 
[Link to a series of help pages]
Help
[Link to the next level up]
Up
[Link to my homepage]
Home

An article from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica, now in the public domain.
Any color photos are mine, © William P. Thayer.

Vol. IV
 p948 
Caietae Portus

Caietae Portus (mod. Gaeta), an ancient harbour of Latium adiectum, Italy, in the territory of Formiae, from which it is 5 m. SW. The name (originally Αἰήτη) is generally derived from the nurse of Aeneas. The harbour, owing to its fine anchorage, was much in use, but the place was never a separate town, but always dependent on Formiae. Livy mentions a temple of Apollo. The coast of the Gulf not only between Caietae Portus and Formiae, but E of the latter also, as far as the modern Monte Scauri, was a favourite summer resort (see Formia). Cicero may have had villas both at Portus Caietae and at Formiae proper,​1 and the emperors certainly possessed property at both places. After the destruction of Formiae in A.D. 847 it became one of the most important seaports of central Italy (see Gaeta). In the town are scanty remains of an amphitheatre and theatre: near the church of La Trinità, higher up, are remains of a large reservoir. There are also traces of an aqueduct. The promontory (548 ft.) is crowned by the tomb of Munatius Plancus, founder of Lugudunum (mod. Lyons), who died after 22 B.C. It is a circular structure of blocks of travertine 160 ft. high and 180 ft. in diameter. Further inland is the so‑called tomb of L. Atratinus, about 100 ft. in diameter. Caietae Portus was no doubt connected with the Via Appia (which passed through Formiae) by a deverticulum. There seems also to have been a road running WNW along the precipitous coast to Speluncae (mod. Sperlonga).

See E. Gesualdo, Osservazioni critiche sopra la storia della Via Appia di Pratilli p7 (Naples, 1754).

[T. As.]


The Author's Note:

1 The two places are sufficiently close for the one villa to have borne both names; but Mommsen (Corp. Inscrip. Lat. x, Berlin, 1883, p603) prefers to differentiate them.


[image ALT: Valid HTML 4.01.]

Page updated: 18 Nov 17

Accessibility